Moving to NZ

Is New Zealand Safe for Immigrant Communities?

· 10 min read · By

AUCKLAND, DECEMBER 29, 2025

When members of the Sikh community gathered in Manurewa earlier this month for their annual Nagar Kirtan procession, they expected a celebration of faith. Instead, they were met with a phalanx of black-clad protesters from Brian Tamaki's "True Patriots" movement, performing an intimidating haka and unfurling banners declaring: "This is New Zealand, not India."

The police separated the groups, ensuring physical safety, but the psychological damage was done. Images of the confrontation went viral globally, causing diplomatic tremors in New Delhi just days before New Zealand announced the conclusion of its historic Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with India.

As 2025 draws to a close, Aotearoa finds itself at a volatile crossroads. The government's economic imperative to open doors to the world is colliding head-on with a resurgent, organized nativism on the streets, and deep divisions within the coalition Cabinet itself.

For immigrant communities, particularly those from South Asia targeted by recent rhetoric, the question is no longer academic: Is New Zealand's long-held reputation for tolerance buckling under political pressure?


The Catalyst: The India FTA and the "Mobility" Price Tag

The current tensions are inextricably linked to the newly finalized India-NZ FTA. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has championed this deal as essential for diversifying New Zealand's export reliance away from China.

However, the price of access to India's massive consumer market was a significant "Mobility Chapter." The deal, set to be signed in 2026, grants up to 3,000 annual work visas for Indian professionals and uncapped post-study work rights for STEM students.

While business groups cheered, the announcement acted as an accelerant for anti-immigration sentiment that had been simmering beneath the surface of a strained economy.


The Coalition Fractured: Winston Peters as the Enabler

The political environment creating space for this sentiment begins at the very top. The governing coalition is openly fractured on the issue.

Winston Peters, Deputy Prime Minister (until May) and leader of New Zealand First, has returned to his traditional role as the "handbrake" on immigration. Despite being the Foreign Minister responsible for diplomatic relationships, Peters has publicly trashed the India FTA as a "low-quality deal" that "gives too much away."

He has confirmed NZ First will vote against the implementing legislation in 2026, forcing the National-ACT component of the government to rely on Labour votes to pass their flagship trade policy.

Peters' opposition is crucial. By validating the idea from within the Cabinet room that these new visa categories are a threat to New Zealanders, he provides a veneer of high-level political legitimacy to cruder sentiments expressed on the street. He is fighting the FTA in a suit and tie, creating a permissive environment for others to fight it with intimidation.


The Theatrics of Exclusion: Tamaki's New Crusade

Into this permissive environment has stepped Brian Tamaki and Destiny Church.

Following the end of pandemic mandates, Tamaki's movement faced a relevance crisis. To maintain momentum (and the financial tithing of his base), a pivot was required. Tamaki has seamlessly transitioned from anti-vax populism to a form of "Christian Nationalism" that views non-Christian immigration as an existential threat.

The disruption of the Sikh parade was a calculated piece of political theatre. Tamaki is attempting to out-flank Winston Peters, positioning himself as the man taking direct action while Peters merely maneuvers in Parliament.

By framing the issue as a defense of "Kiwi culture" against "foreign invasion"—specifically targeting visible minorities like the Sikh community—Tamaki is tapping into genuine anxieties among working-class voters about housing shortages, strained infrastructure, and wage competition. He is weaponizing these structural problems into racialized resentment.


The Safety Audit: A Fraying Social Licence?

So, is New Zealand safe?

Physically, the immediate threat remains low. The police response in Manurewa prioritized de-escalation, preventing physical violence. New Zealand is not currently seeing widespread, organized hate crimes.

However, psychological safety and social cohesion are rapidly fraying.

Prime Minister Luxon's response to the Manurewa incident—condemning it as "not the Kiwi way"—felt thin to many in the targeted communities. Luxon is trapped in a diplomatic tightrope: he must reassure India that its citizens are safe in order to secure the FTA's economic benefits, but he cannot crackdown too forcefully on protesters without alienating the conservative base his coalition partner, NZ First, is actively courting.

The result is a feeling among many immigrant communities that they are political footballs—economically necessary to the government, but socially expendable in the rough-and-tumble of coalition management.


Looking Ahead to 2026

As we head into 2026, the government is inviting thousands of new workers and students to New Zealand shores. The uncomfortable reality is that while the legislative door is open, a loud, organized, and politically emboldened segment of the country is actively trying to slam the social door shut.

For those considering a move to New Zealand, or those already here building their lives, the message is mixed: the legal framework remains welcoming, but the social climate requires vigilance and community solidarity.

Next steps

Book a consultation